To quote Businessweek, Jan 9
2012 issue, the US
produces more than one-quarter more goods and services today than it did in
1999. But uses almost precisely the
same number of workers. Why? We have become a lot more productive thanks
to robotics and other automation techniques.
Magically, $2.5 trillion worth of stuff (from 1999 to present) materialized out of
thin air. No extra workers were needed.
Businesses have bought many new
and modern machines, but not hired many new people. Having run a business, I know people-costs
keep climbing, and adding or subtracting
manpower is not as easy (or as flexible) as turning on and off a robotic
operation.
But in 2011, American
businesses added 540,000 workers. That
flies in the face of the above. Some say technology destroys jobs – but only
some kinds of jobs – and it creates new kinds of jobs (robot repair and
replacement?). This is not much
consolation to the 20 million people supposedly still looking for work. How many of these were in construction? Some cities have seen 70% or more of their
small builders go out of business in the last four years. And big builders have
been shrinking as well. The counter
point to that is, some medium sized builders have taken advantage of the drop
in competition and are turning out more housing product than ever. Maybe not at the normal profit per house, but
they are moving dirt (lots) which is important. And dirt is much cheaper now
than it was 4 years ago.
Automated kiosk’s, automated
TV cameras, voice to text (Dragon and Siri) replacing old fashioned dictation,
paralegals replaced by internet searches, each of these and many more contribute
to job losses – or the lack of hiring. But
some economists think the flat-line demand is responsible. American factories are working well below
their design output. They won’t hire
until more orders come in.
Looming large, world wide, is
youthful and productive populations elsewhere.
Today I read that half the population of India is under 25. And India has 1.2 billion people. India
thus has 2 people under 25 for every person of any age in the USA. Where will they find jobs for all these people as they enter the work force? How can these new people consume if they can't earn money?
No comments:
Post a Comment